LONDON - The Times Atlas of the World exaggerated the rate of Greenland's ice loss in itsthirteenth edition last week, scientists said on Monday.
The atlas, published by HarperCollins, showed that Greenland lost 15 percent of its ice coverover the past 12 years, based on information from the National Snow and Ice Data Center inColorado in the United States.
The Greenland ice sheet is the second biggest in the world and significant shrinking could leadto a global rise in sea levels.
"While global warming has played a role in this reduction, it is also as a result of the much moreaccurate data and in-depth research that is now available," HarperCollins said on its website onMonday.
However, a number of scientists disputed the claim.
"We believe that the figure of a 15 percent decrease in permanent ice cover since thepublication of the previous atlas 12 years (ago) is both incorrect and misleading," said PoulChristoffersen, glaciologist at the Scott Polar Research Institute (SPRI) at the University ofCambridge.
"We concluded that a sizable portion of the area mapped as ice-free in the Atlas is clearly stillice-covered."
Other scientists agreed.
"These new maps are ridiculously off base, way exaggerated relative to the reality of rapidchange in Greenland," said Jeffrey S. Kargel, senior research scientist at the University ofArizona.
The Times Atlas suggested the Greenland ice sheet has lost 300,000 square kilometres in thepast 12 years, at a rate of 1.5 percent per year.
However, measurements suggest this rate is at least 10 times faster than in reality, added J.Graham Cogley, Professor of Geography at Trent University, Ontario, Canada.
"It could easily be 20 times too fast and might well be 50 times too fast," he added.
Last year, a UN committee of climate scientists came under fire for bungling a forecast of whenHimalayan glaciers would thaw.
The panel's 2007 report, the main guide for governments in fighting climate change, includedan incorrect projection that all Himalayan glaciers could vanish by 2035, hundreds of yearsearlier than scientists' projections.
World-Around-The-World-Garden
No comments:
Post a Comment